If worst comes to worst for the Iranians and they feel their entire existence is at stake, they could engage in non-martyr activities such as military attacks against the U.S. For example, remember the damage the Argentines did with one Exorcet missile to a British warship? And Iranian divers with remote controlled explosive devices could also create problems. Again, much of this activity would occur at night when it would be more difficult for the U.S. to respond. And if you think Russia and China would just sit idly by watching Iran implode, you are quite mistaken. I'm sure they have already let President Obama know the possibly "grave" consequences if the U.S. intervenes in a war between Iran and Israel if the Israelis attacked first.The Israelis are aware of this and therefore may create an "incident" which would cause the Iranians to strike first. This is like Secretary of War Henry Stimson (Skull & Bones member) wrote in his diary on November 25, 1941 about a meeting with President Roosevelt: "...the question was how we should maneuver them (Japan) into the position of firing the first shot."For example, Israel recently attacked a depository of Fatah rockets in Syria that were headed for Hezbollah. Also, there have been recent news articles about Syria's chemical weapons, and Israel could launch military action into Syria to "protect" Assad's chemical weapons from falling into the hands of terrorists. Either military action, however, could be seen by Iran as simply attacking the Assad regime, and therefore the Iranians might respond militarily against Israel. This could then be used by the U.S. (or NATO) as a justification for attacking Iran, claiming Iran was the aggressor against Israel. Or, in a variation on this tactic, Israel's ally, the U.S. (or NATO), could attack the facilities containing those weapons, hoping that Iran would come to the defense of its ally Syria. Then that Iranian military response against the U.S. (or NATO) would be used by the U.S. (or NATO) as a justification for striking Iran while claiming Iran had been the aggressor.Another military action in which Iran might engage could be telling various terrorist groups in the region to shoot down the civilian airliners of Israeli allies with shoulder-launched missiles reportedly already given the terrorists by Iran (see TIME, March 11, 2013, p.22).Now, if the Israelis do attack Iran and none of the aforementioned logical possibilities happens, you might similarly consider the possibility that this is all one big play being acted out on a global scale. Remember that the current mullahs ruling Iran followed Ayatollah Khomeini, who was a follower of Ayatollah Kashani, whom the CIA paid $10,000 to go along with the overthrow of democratically elected Mohammad Mossadegh in 1953. In other words, the leaders of Iran (including President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad) could be right out of "central casting" in the Power Elite's (PE's) global play for world control.Remember, the title of my latest book is THE POWER ELITE AND THE SECRET NAZI PLAN. The Shah of Iran in the 1930s changed the name of his country from Persia to Iran (which means Aryan) because of his admiration of Hitler. Also, one of the 6 major countries the Nazis' Operation Eagle Flight (using stocks, bonds, gold, etc. to create or control corporations) involved was Turkey. According to author Paul Williams (author of CRESCENT MOON RISING, 2013), the CIA for years has known about opium from Afghanistan's poppy fields going by cargo planes to Iran on their way to Turkey. And, Williams said, a major beneficiary of this has been Fethullah Gulen (born in Turkey in 1941 and now living in Pennsylvania), whose worth of about $30 billion has allowed him to have tremendous political power and move the government of Turkey from a secular one to one that is predominantly Islamic. He has established many charter schools in the U.S. (tax-funded) as well as schools in Turkey and the Caspian area (e.g., Turkmenistan, etc.). According toWilliams, there's a CIA agent in every one of these Caspian area schools, and Gulen's purpose is to build a New Islamic World Order.But, you may then ask, if the "central casting" leaders of Iran, like Gulen of Turkey, are agents of the PE, why are the Iranian leaders threatening Israel? You have to remember the PE's tactic of using threats to coerce people and nations to compromise. As Lincoln Bloomfield wrote in Staff Memorandum No.7 (1962) for Secretary of State Dean Rusk (Rhodes scholar): "...if the communist dynamic was greatly abated, the West might lose whatever incentive it has for world government." In the case of Israel and Iran, the statement would read: "...if the Iranian dynamic was greatly abated, Israel might lose whatever incentive it has for world government." The objective is to get Israel and every other nation to compromise their national sovereignty and agree to live "in peace" under a World Authority (World Socialist Government, WSG). The WSG, of course, will be presented as "benevolent," as in W.J. Ghent's book OUR BENEVOLENT FEUDALISM (1902). Nations which attempt to rebel against the WSG will be considered pariahs and ostracizied by the other nations of the world. They will be cut off economically from all other nations and quickly learn the hardships of the adage "no man (or nation) is an island." Submission to the "benevolent" will of the WSG will be all but guaranteed.And the fate of any individual similarly trying to "buck the system" was described by W. J. Ghent in his article, "The Next Step: A Benevolent Feudalism" (THE INDEPENDENT, April 3, 1902): "...Group Fidelity...is already observable....The autocrats...will distribute benefits to the degree that makes a tolerant, if not satisfied people....A person of offensive activity may be denied work in every feudal shop and on every feudal farm from one end of the country to the other....His actions will be promptly communicated to the banded autocracy of dukes, earls, and marquises of industries....The individual security of place and livelihood of its members will then depend on the harmony of their utterances and acts with the wishes of the great nobles; and so long as they rightly fulfill their functions their recompense will be generous.They will be at once the assuagers of popular suspicion and discontent and the providers of moral and intellectual anodynes for the barons....A host of economists, preachers and editors will be ready to show indisputably that the evolution taking place is for the best interests of all....The nobles will have attained to complete power, and the motive and operation of Government will have become simply the registering and administering of their collective will....Armed force will, of course, be employed to overawe t6he discontented and to quiet unnecessary turbulence. Unlike the armed forces of the old feudalism, the nominal control will be that of the State....When the new order is in full swing...so comprehensive and so exact will be the social and political control that it will be exercised in a constantly widening scope....Peace (and stability) will be the main desideratum....A happy blending of generosity and firmness will characterize all dealings with open discontent...(to) the prevention of discontent...the teachings of the schools and colleges, the sermons, the editorials...and even the plays at the theaters will be skillfully and persuasively moulded."