This article is sponsored as a public service of the Worldview Weekend Foundation. Thank you for your contribution to www.wvwfoundation.com so we can continue to offer this FREE service.

You can also send your contribution to:

Worldview Weekend Foundation
P.O. Box 1690
Collierville, TN 38027

Click here and visit www.wvwtvstore.com to order emergency, freeze-dried food that will last 25 years and vital emergency supplies or call 901-468-9357.

Introduction:

In a recent interview on Brannon Howse Live, FBI whistleblower Stephen Friend shed light on concerning issues plaguing the agency's vetting process and the potential presence of mentally unsound agents. Friend's testimony, along with that of his colleague Kyle Seraphin, gained widespread attention after they testified before a House congressional committee. The discussion centered around an alarming article by Todd Bensman, detailing an FBI analyst's involvement with terrorist suspects. Friend's insights provide a unique perspective on the matter, highlighting the need for a thorough examination of the FBI's recruitment and screening procedures.

Questionable Vetting Process:

Friend began by expressing his surprise at the lack of psychological evaluations during the FBI's hiring process. He contrasted this with his previous experience as a police officer, where he underwent a rigorous assessment of his mental fitness to handle the demands of the job. The absence of such evaluations within the FBI raises concerns about potential mental health issues among agents.

The analyst discussed in Bensman's article had been in contact with individuals already under FBI investigation for potential terrorist activities before joining the agency. This revelation calls into question the effectiveness of the FBI's vetting procedures. How could an individual engaged in such conversations be hired without their prior actions being scrutinized?

Flawed Investigations and Political Expediency:

Friend also highlighted the prolonged nature of the investigation into the analyst's actions. Despite being in contact with suspicious individuals and potentially compromising national security, the case took several years to reach its conclusion. Friend expressed skepticism about the timing of the sentencing, suggesting it was politically expedient and designed to support a narrative against then-President Trump.

Mental Health Concerns in the FBI:

Drawing attention to recent changes within the FBI, Friend discussed the agency's increasing focus on mental wellness programs. He referred to initiatives like paid mental health time, yoga classes, massage chairs, and painting lessons being offered to employees. While advocating for individuals with mental health issues to seek help, Friend raised concerns about the presence of such agents in sensitive positions that require security clearances. He questioned the logic of allowing individuals who might be unfit for duty to access classified information, potentially compromising national security.

Implications for Public Safety:

The conversation took a chilling turn as Friend and Howse discussed the potential dangers posed by mentally unstable agents. The image of an FBI agent with a badge, gun, and unchecked mental instability raises serious concerns. Friend shared his own experience, mentioning how the Employee Assistance Program was weaponized against him when he refused to seek counseling. It highlighted the challenges whistleblowers face within the agency.

The Aftermath of Testimony:

Friend's testimony before Congress generated significant attention. He mentioned receiving outreach from members of Congress seeking recommendations for the Holman Rule, which could impact salaries and programs within the FBI. Additionally, a fundraising campaign was launched to support other whistleblowers, and over half a million dollars were raised to assist them. This development highlighted the growing awareness and support for those who come forward to expose wrongdoing.

Conclusion:

Stephen Friend's interview shed light on alarming lapses in the FBI's vetting process and the potential presence of mentally unsound agents within the agency. The discussion underscored the need for a comprehensive evaluation of recruitment and screening procedures to ensure that individuals with mental health issues are not placed in sensitive positions. By addressing these concerns, the FBI can strengthen its effectiveness and maintain public trust in its crucial mission of safeguarding national security.

This article is sponsored as a public service of the Worldview Weekend Foundation. Thank you for your contribution to www.wvwfoundation.com so we can continue to offer this FREE service.

You can also send your contribution to:

Worldview Weekend Foundation
P.O. Box 1690
Collierville, TN 38027

Click here and visit www.wvwtvstore.com to order emergency, freeze-dried food that will last 25 years and vital emergency supplies or call 901-468-9357.