This article is sponsored as a public service of the Worldview Weekend Foundation. Thank you for your contribution to www.wvwfoundation.com so we can continue to offer this FREE service.

You can also send your contribution to:

Worldview Weekend Foundation
P.O. Box 1690
Collierville, TN 38027

Click here and visit www.wvwtvstore.com to order emergency, freeze-dried food that will last 25 years and vital emergency supplies or call 901-468-9357.

Recent developments regarding the formation of a faith-based security council by the Biden administration have stirred controversy and raised concerns among certain circles. The council's purpose is to advise officials on how to ensure the safety of churches, given the reported increase in attacks against them in recent years. However, Brannon Howse and Usama Dakdok have expressed apprehension about the council's composition, pointing out the inclusion of figures such as Al Sharpton and individuals with alleged ties to Islamist groups. These concerns have ignited debates surrounding the effectiveness and motivations of the council's members in protecting religious institutions. This conference between Usama Dakdok and Brannon Howse took place on Brannon Howse Live.

Attacks on Churches and the Perception of Christians

According to a statement from one D.C. based group, attacks against churches have reportedly tripled over the past four years. This concerning trend has led to questions about the reasons behind such attacks. Some critics argue that media narratives portraying Christians as the source of suffering and oppression have contributed to the rise in aggression towards Christian communities. The belief that drag queens, transgenders, and other groups are targeting Christians is attributed to the formation of a coalition of victims, as highlighted in Brannon Howse's book, Grave Influence and Marxianity. This coalition, created by Marxist Herbert Marcuse, includes immigrants, the poor, sexual minorities, and feminist groups, who collectively identify Christians as their oppressors.

The Concerns Over the Inclusion of Controversial Figures

The controversy surrounding the faith-based security council arises from the appointment of individuals with controversial backgrounds and alleged ties to terrorist tied Islamist organizations such as Muslim Brotherhood. Critics argue that the inclusion of figures like Al Sharpton, a former leader of the National LGBTQ Task Force, and Muslim leaders involved in fundraisers for convicted cop killers, raises questions about the council's ability to genuinely protect Christian communities.

One of the individuals in question is Imam Mohammed Majid, the executive director of the Dulles Area Muslim Society Center. Critics argue that he has associations with the Muslim Brotherhood, an organization that dates back to their work with Adolf Hitler.

Similarly, Salam Moriarty, co-founder of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, has also been identified as having connections to the Muslim Brotherhood. Experts believe that these affiliations raise doubts about the true intentions and motives behind the council's establishment.

A Mafia-Like Protection Ring Analogy

To illustrate their concerns, some commentators liken the situation to a mafia protection racket. They argue that the council's offer to protect Christian churches mirrors a scenario in which a mafia group offers protection to a business after vandalizing it themselves. This analogy suggests that the council's aim is not genuine protection but rather to impose restrictions on free speech and religious beliefs. Critics contend that this would require Christians to adhere to a set of standards dictated by the council, compromising their faith and values. So called hate crime laws as prompted by Islamist and Marxists are being implemented all around the world that are being used to prosecute Christians that speak out against the LGBTQ agenda and the real goal and history of Islam.

The Perspective of Usama Dakdok

Usama Dakdok, a commentator with personal experiences in Egypt, adds his perspective to the conversation. Dakdok highlights the historical context of the Pact of Omar, a deal made by Muslims in Egypt centuries ago to protect Christians. He draws parallels between that period and the current situation, suggesting that the Muslims who attacked Christians then are now claiming to protect them. Dakdok questions the ability of individuals with anti-Christian sentiments, such as Al Sharpton, to genuinely ensure the safety of Christian communities.

The controversy surrounding the inclusion of certain figures in the Biden administration's faith-based security council highlights concerns about the council's infiltration of churches and their use of politically correct standards to control and manipulation churches into self-censorship. Critics argue that the presence of individuals with ties to Islamist organizations raises doubts about their motivations and the potential impact on religious freedom and free speech.

Click here to watch this segment on Brannon Howse Live:
https://www.worldviewweekend.com/tv/video/biden-regime-appoints-terrori…

This article is sponsored as a public service of the Worldview Weekend Foundation. Thank you for your contribution to www.wvwfoundation.com so we can continue to offer this FREE service.

You can also send your contribution to:

Worldview Weekend Foundation
P.O. Box 1690
Collierville, TN 38027

Click here and visit www.wvwtvstore.com to order emergency, freeze-dried food that will last 25 years and vital emergency supplies or call 901-468-9357.